WearTesters is reader-supported. When you make purchases using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Why trust us?

adidas T-Mac Millennium Performance Review

The adidas T-Mac Millennium performance review has arrived.

Back in the days of long ago, there was a 6’10” point guard named Tracy McGrady. He came to the NBA from high school and went to the North Lands where he teamed with his cousin, Vince Carter, to form one of the most promising young teams in the league. However, fate decided to send the young one to the sunny beaches of Orlando and he created Magic with Grant Hill. Once in the sunshine, he was given a signature line called, appropriately, T-Mac (nicknames in the 90’s/early 2000’s weren’t really creative). So now we arrive here, in 2019, and adidas has taken the basic structure of the T-Mac 1 and added Boost, for the Millenium. Is the shoe stuck in the past or is it ready for today’s new generation of players inspired by the original? Let’s see…

Buy adidas T-Mac Millenium

Freaking awesome. Dust – no problem. Dust bunnies – no problem. Tumbleweeds – No. Problem. This is some of the best traction I have played in from any brand in the last few years. I did have to wipe a few times each wear (usually once or twice per game and I played 5-7 games a night for 5 nights). Full-length multi-directional herringbone that actually varies in pattern size, it pushes dust away from the center of the shoe and almost all of it makes its way off of the outsole. It’s amazing traction can still be bad on some models when, after the last three adidas I’ve reviewed (Harden Vol.3, N3XT L3V3L, and these) have all used some variation of herringbone and all been incredible.

Outdoors? Nah, not an extremely good option, but better than the Harden or N3XT. The pattern is deeper and the rubber is a little harder but it is still not built for concrete seasons. That’s a shame, because the rest of the shoe screams playground construction.

BOOOOOOST!!!! While the original T-Mac 1 had adiprene+ in the forefoot and adiprene in the heel, the Millenium ups the ante with a full-length Boost midsole that feels freaking great. The Millenium feels like the Crazy Explosive 2017 – it rides low in the forefoot without jarring impact, providing quick response. Some Boost midsoles feel too soft and mushy, making your steps feel a little slower – not the case with the Millenium. This can be credited to the forefoot caging on the lateral side, keeping the Boost from compressing completely to the floor and also adding stability to the forefoot (more on that later). The Millenium honestly feels quick despite looking high and bulky.

The heel is more Boost, which is not a bad thing. There is no caging, so it is all about impact protection, which is great. There is a slight lag in response time because of the compression, but I will take a slight lag for added impact at my age. One other thing – there is a section of the outsole that comes up the heel Boost slightly – nice little nod to the original model.

When images first started coming out of the Millennium I got a little happy. Not “trip to Bahamas” happy, but “look – LEATHER!!!” happy. Sadly, it wasn’t meant to be, as the upper is a very leather-like synthetic. The body of the upper has images printed on it that I honestly have no idea what they mean – feathers, arrows, swords, lots of Native American images (only on this colorway – the others have different print). The toecap is a higher grade synthetic than the midfoot and rear panels – but still fake. This makes the upper really, reeeaaalllly stiff to start but is also durable as #$!!. If you grab these, give them at least 3-4 wears to break in and you will have a great feel.

The tongue is a classic separate system and allows the upper to be pulled tight with no bunching of the upper. It’s mesh to help with heat because that upper is an oven in Texas in July (believe me). No idea what the heel piece is for – it provides nothing structurally and mine actually started digging into the heel and making a funny, squeaky sound (word to Griswold). It does have a wood-grain print on the inside, a subtle callback to the heel counter of the T-Mac V that featured actual wood in the shoe. There are also some pretty massive heel/Achilles pads in the liner that lock your foot in and feel perfect.

Wide-footers, REJOICE!!!! This may be the shoe for you!!! The Millennium can go one of two ways for fit – if you are slightly wide or want a little wiggle room in the toe box, go true to size. If you want a snugger fit that needs very little adjustment, go a half-size down. I myself went true and some wears I wish I went down and some I am okay true. This is where the tongue system being classic construction really comes in handy, allowing the upper to be pulled tight without pain or a knit/one-piece material bunching up and causing pain or blisters. The synthetic toe cap does eventually break in but it is still a little stiff, so going down half may put your toe right into that cap and be rough.

Heel fit, once broken in, is locked. The padding mentioned above locks you tight and the lacing runs high enough to pull you foot back into the heel counter and down. Midfoot fit is more of the same – once broken in, the flex learns your foot and feels completely locked in.

All the normal features are here – good lacing system, good fit, synthetic upper that is stiff and supportive. The one thing adidas has added since the Rose 5 is a full-length shank plate that works with the Boost to provide spring and reflex. Sometimes it’s called an Infinity shank and sometimes it looks like a fork, but it works. One thing the Millennium does is lateral stability, and it has it in serious style. The toecap works to limit any movement side-to-side. The outsole comes up the lateral side and cages the Boost but also wraps up and over the toes and toecap, providing just a little more containment and stability.

There is an internal heel counter that works with the lacing to really lock the heel in and we already talked about the internal padding. The Millennium is a super-stable shoe that feels like a lighter low on foot.

I am about to drop some high praise, and I thought ling and hard about saying this, but here goes – this is my favorite adidas basketball shoe since the Rose 7, and is in my top 5 adidas shoes ever (Supernatural Creator, Rose 7, Rose 1.5, T-Mac 6 are the others). I think this shoe is better for me than the Harden Vol.3, and it was the #2 shoe for me in 2018. If you are looking for a great all-around shoe, locked in fit (after break-in), awesome traction and cushioning, and that nostalgic T-Mac look and memories, this is the shoe for you. Anyone can wear this shoe and enjoy it – it’s truly suitable for any position, just like T-Mac. Maybe if he had Boost back then he would still be putting up triple-doubles.

Buy adidas T-Mac Millenium
  1. Another great review Duke. I really respect you and Chris’s reviews because you both come from old school era of sneakers like me. Keep up the good work Bro!

    1. McGrady can play multiple positions. Put it that way. If needed he can play point guard/forward and bring the ball up and direct plays.

  2. Thanks for review!
    I like the looks, but in my experience oldschool-ish materials usually have “breathability” issues, compared to modern knits or open celled mesh. How’s air flow on these?

    1. Actually, in an interview in Kicks magazine from 2004, Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan are sitting with Mac and confirmed he was 6’10”. His listed height was his rookie height and he grew 2 inches after being drafted and didn’t want to change his list.

      As for being a point guard, again, he wasn’t listed as point – neither is Luke or Lebron – but who brings the ball up an initiates the plays? Thanks for liking the review though – that’s truly the point. Appreciate the love.

  3. Nice good review man. ive been stoked about this and the Rose 10. I wore the T Macs when they originally released and we have similar taste in

  4. That’s a pretty strong list to be on. I may have to give these a try (on discount of course). Boost hasn’t exactly worked for me because of the weight. I loved the Rose 7s, they just felt bottom-heavy. Can’t wait for the Rose 1.5s to retro. Having some supernatural creators in my hands again would be dope.

    I appreciate you and Chris reviewing the kicks that you do. Not limited to a brand or specific line.

  5. I’ll have to search these out and try a pair on to see how they feel. I still look for and play in Rose 7 Primeknit due to my age (double nickel) but have been considering the WhyNotZero.1 (Chaos version) with full length zoom. Have you played in the WhyNots and if so how do they compare with the T-Mac? Thanks for the review and information!

    1. These are definitely softer and have a more generous fit than the Why Not. Traction is about the same. Mobility and free feeling goes to the tmac.

  6. The wide-foot fit probably isn’t for me, but great to know Adidas didn’t hash out a reintroduced T-Mac in a half-assed way. Crazy to find you like it even more than the Harden V3.

    Adidas has been interesting in keeping their line solid. Replaced the Explosive with the Pro Bounce, and demoting the Rose line.

  7. I played in the Harden Vol. 3’s for the first time yesterday on a very slightly dusty court and the traction was horrible, sliding all over the place. I switched back to my previous shoe – Nike Hyperdunk X low, and had no issues with sliding. Another player from my gym previously tried the Harden’s and had the exact same issue, to the point where neither of us will ever play in them again. These look like they have similar traction pattern, herringbone, but pretty tight together. Just wondering if you think I’d have the same issue with these? Not sure how the Harden 3’s got such a high traction rating on all the reviews here?

    1. I had a very similar experience when I first wore my Harden Vol 3s. They would’ve gotten a different rating had that single time of use would have concluded my testing experience. We also have written reviews that explain our experiences a bit better than the score card. The score card is there to compliment the review. It is not meant to be the review.

    2. I’ve seen multiple people play on this same court in the harden 3 with no issues – actually had 2 in them today and one plays just like Beard. I could see them giving issues if their is a ton of dust and no wiping, but don’t give up.

  8. I have 3 pairs of Hardens. They require break-in time. Especially the solid outsole. I slid the first few times I wore them too. But with break-in they got much better. Much like the Dame 5. With a lot of shoes, especially Adidas, I feel like you can’t judge the traction based on the first wear.

  9. Don’t exactly get it:
    TMacs get: “This is some of the best traction I have played in from any brand in the last few years”. And they don’t get “hall of fame status”.

    Dame 5’s get: “On clean and semi-clean courts, this pattern is strong, gripping on every move and let me accelerate quickly with no slips. However, on a dirty, old, unfinished court, the slips were real and numerous.”. And it becomes “Hall of fame”

    You need to work on consistency on notes, or on expressing your level of love towards certain aspects of the shoe 🙂 Just sayin… 🙂
    Overall, great reviewing work, keep up 🙂

    1. The reason I scored the Dame higher is because of the outdoor factor. Indoors, on the same courts, they were about equal. The Dame has a thicker, harder tread so it should be better and more durable. Thanks for the love though!!!

  10. Today I Buy A Pair Thanks To Your Review On Traction And Cushion, I Have Others Adidas And I Like Bounce-Boost More Than Nike Air, The Exception Is Lunarlon.

Add a Comment

Related Posts