Looks like the team over at Fastpass is at it again, and this time, the saw was taken to the Nike KD Trey 5 V.
The takedown model draws some inspiration from the KD 10’s lacing system and forefoot flex groove, but apart from that, everything is different — for better or worse. Also, the tooling is almost identical to that of the Nike Zoom Live, with some very minute changes. (You can find more information regarding the KD Trey 5 V here.)
The KD Trey 5 V has a pretty small Zoom unit in the forefoot that is bottom-loaded. Like most of the takedown models from Nike, there is nothing in the heel, so nothing out of the ordinary there.
What is interesting to note is the thickness of the Zoom unit, however. The KD Trey 5 V’s Zoom unit is 7.11mm thick and 35.28mm wide. Compare that to the Nike Zoom Live’s 8.18mm and 39.89mm, and you can see that the KD Trey has a little less bang for the buck.
There’s no word on price or when these are set to release Stateside but after seeing these deconstructed, are you going to cop or drop? See anything interesting that caught your eye? Let us know what you think in the comment section below.
As always, keep it locked to WearTesters for any upcoming news and reviews on the KD Trey 5 V.
For comparison, take a look at the KD Trey 5 V’s tooling and the Nike Zoom Live’s tooling.
Source: Fastpass
That’s a sad Zoom bag.
To be fair, it’s slightly smaller than the Zoom Live’s Zoom unit, so it might work. Though if this is over $100, I’d just stick with the KD 9.
Smallest zoom bag I’ve ever seen.
I dont get why people would buy shoes like this. You can just get last years flagship model for the same price or cheaper but with all the tech (many KD9’s can be found for around $80 at this point).
Honestly, I’m not too sure either. Before, the takedown model used to be the preferred choice over the flagship (the Kobe Mentality 1 comes to mind), but you’re right.
Yep, if you want the best bang for buck at this point, it’s best to just grab the previous flagship or spend up for the latest if you can. These takedown models with sad tech are just ridiculous. The only benefit over some of the flagship models that I’ve noticed on some models is that the traction pattern will actually be better (stronger/more consistent) sometimes on the takedowns. So there’s that tradeoff. I just got a pair of 31 from Finishline with a coupon and the rewards for a decent price but their performance in the traction department is laughable.
To your point about traction pattern, this particular pair is outfitted with XDR, so all the outdoor hoopers can have durable rubber. Still, I would much rather get the flagships or something from another brand completely.
Agreed. Trust me, I definitely agree.
Nike smh. this is why people who know think nike is an absolute joke