WearTesters is reader-supported. When you make purchases using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Why trust us?

The Nike Zoom Rev 2017 (Hyperrev) is Available Now

New year, new me – said the Hyperrev line, as Nike Basketball gives the budget line some Ritalin – renaming the shoe the Nike Zoom Rev 2017.

Nike has been known to throw in the word Hyper on many of its sneakers dating back to the Hyperdunk, so this name change would be a big shift from those times for Nike Basketball. Who knows why exactly the name was changed, although the spelling may have played a part (two Rs, not one.)

In any case, the surprisingly well-performing budget line is back in 2017 with a new (strapless) look.

The Zoom Rev 2017 appears to feature a similar textile upper in terms of the ‘Fuse backing, although this version looks more ventilated in select areas. A pull tab is added to the heel, making this version a lot easier to sneak your foot into compared to the 2016 Hyperrev. A more plush collar lining looks to improve comfort in the area as well. The classic herringbone traction looks promising, with the pattern moving up to the sides much like the Kyrie line. The only real downside of the shoe is the removal of Zoom Air in the heel (it is forefoot only now).

Click HERE to check out the Nike Zoom Rev 2017 which retails for $110.

 

17 comments
  1. It’s real simple for me…..I’m not buying any shoes that don’t have full length or at least both forefoot and heel cushion. Too many options out there. Nike/Jordan can kick rocks if they don’t bring it.

    1. Seriously. Nike/Jordan has so many models that have gone backwards or stagnated in so far as cushioning. Nike’s become way too complacent.

  2. I feel like this traction will be pretty bad. With the arch off the ground and the weird exaggerated ripple on the sole, it seems like theres not much actual traction touching the ground

    1. It might be exactly as you say, but I kinda think that the outsold will flatten out when pressure is applied like the Kyrie 2.

  3. This is extremely disappointing to me. Why? Because one of my favorite Nike Budget model was the Nike Hyperrev 2014. It featured FULL LENGTH ZOOM for only $120. Honestly that shoe was a huge bang for my buck. It’s a shame that nike has to take away the full length zoom and made it heel and forefoot. & Now they’re only doing forefoot zoom?! Like what?!?!

    1. I totally agree. Nike keeps on disappointing by removing tech every year and by releasing ‘new’ models that are just some D grade performers with no real tech just because they’re a ‘budget friendly model’. And it is sad to see so many people wearing those bullshit models just because they’re Nikes

  4. Wait, so why would I get these over the Hyperdunk 2016 low that’s now 110 or cheaper? LOL! The hell is Nike really doing? They aren’t the only company slacking in some departments I guess but they sure do make it easy to spot.

  5. Am I the only one who’s disappointed by the overall design? The original Hyperrev was something fresh and original that I thought had great potential. Last year seemed to be headed on the right track but it now appears that the shoe has devolved into a generic, bland budget model

  6. Don’t they have a bunch of budget models already with forefoot-only zoom? Why bother making another one?

    The rev line was known for its heel and forefoot zoom. They should’ve just called this the hyperfuse 2017.

  7. At first i thought these looked to bland compared to previous iterations. But the black and gum look great despite the more traditional design.

  8. No rear zoom? Oh shit, not for me then. I mean….The 15 and 16s were my fave shoes to use (I like the 15 more but my old creeky ankles likes some more cushioning) to the point I’ve sold my Rose 6s to keep ’em. But no Zoom, no deal. And it is sad because I kinda like the design. It is a real pity Nike is killing this line.

  9. If this represents the direction of the Hyperrev, I’m about to buy as many HyperRev 2016s as possible.

    So disappointed to see that Nike in not only taking away the tech but the style. I’m not impressed by these.

Add a Comment

Related Posts