WearTesters is reader-supported. When you make purchases using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Why trust us?

Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO – Another Look

Overseas retailers continue to update their online inventory as the Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO has made their way to their stores.

This lighter version of the Super.Fly 3 will provide you with two things its predecessor did not – ventilation and material flexibility.  You’ll lose a tiny bit of support, but you’ll still retain support right where you need it with the Fuse overlays. I’m definitely interested to see how these feel and flex on-foot compared to the original version since the upper on those were a little too stiff for my liking.

Check out another look at the upcoming Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO, and share your thoughts on them below in the comment section. Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO - Another Look 1 Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO - Another Look 2 Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO - Another Look 3 Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO - Another Look 5 Jordan Super.Fly 3 PO - Another Look 6

11 comments
  1. The materials look like the Kyrie. I’m just not that excited about this year’s Jordan line. CP3 VIII use to be a traction beast and now it’s merely average to below average. I don’t think the AE model can change the traction pattern, but maybe use a different rubber compound? The Melo 11 actually looks good, but other than the Cardinal pair, the materials seem cheap. The Super Fly’s material is so stiff and these P.O. just don’t do it for me. I’m hoping next year’s line will incorporate the woven materials of the xx9.

    1. To be fair this doesn’t see. Like the Kyrie or Kobe where its fuse with mesh stuck on, these seem more like actual mesh that will let heat/moisture flow, there’s a difference IMO. The original materials on that were stiff as all hell so I hope there’s an improvement.

      1. how can you tell there isnt fuse backing by just looking at it? Coz to me it in may have fuse backing due to its structured look unlike the hyperrevs.

  2. To those who got the SF3, is the fuse really that stiff when playing? Though it does feel plasticky yet supportive in-hand though. If not I’ll get the SF2 PO instead…

    1. The SF3 has a better lockdown and more supportive cushion for the PF type players. I like it but the SF2 is more form fitting at the start and the proplate zoom is more bouncey. I think the SF3 is meant more for the long run and more durable. This pair looks like it has addressed the stiff fit issue. I think they fused too much of the upper on the SF3.

  3. I like the development(the materials seem a little nicer, more natural), although the back-tab is forced on.

  4. They look great a couple weeks back I even drew up a couple concepts that really look like this

Add a Comment

Related Posts